Guillermo Gallego Munoz v. County of Imperial

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal plaintiffs were strangers to state-court proceedings and affirming entry of injunction against county officials
• courts “need not and do not consider a new contention that could have been but was not raised on the prior appeal”
• \[D]efendants ... are now raising a new issue that they did not raise in their last appeal to this court. We need not and do not consider a new contention that could have been but was not raised on the prior appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).