Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs successfully alleged a credible threat of future injury based, in part, on the defendant agency's own estimate that salinity standards would be violated under its proposed operational plan
• noting that “a standing determination should not be based only on statistical probabilities if other specific circumstances render the threat of injury more or less likely than the statistics might otherwise suggest”
• noting that \a standing determination should not be based only on statistical probabilities if other specific circumstances render the threat of injury more or less likely than the statistics might otherwise suggest\
• standing to seek injunction where method of operating dam was highly likely to severely hamper plain­ tiffs’ ability to grow crops
• standing to seek injunction where method of operating dam was highly likely to severely hamper plaintiffs’ ability to grow crops
• characterizing the Court’s finding of standing in Laidlaw as based on “the threatened future damage to plaintiffs’ environmental interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).