Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasonable inferences from the evidence are enough to prevent a judgment as a matter of law
• courts can overturn a jury verdict only when it is clearly unsupported by substantial evidence
• reasonable inferences from the evidence are enough to prevent a judgment as a matter of law
• “Instructions to which no exceptions are taken become the law of the case.” (citing Ralls v. Bonney, 56 Wn.2d 342, 343, 353 P.2d 158 (1960))
• “The literal meaning of these terms [‘and’ and ‘or’] should be followed unless it renders the statute inoperable or the meaning becomes questionable.”
• \Instructions to which no exceptions are taken become the law of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).