Skip to main content
· 10/7/2008

Guidry v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 269 S.W.3d 520
  • 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1373
  • 2008 WL 4515309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the 4 In Defendant’s appellate briefing to this Court, he attempts to suggest that Plaintiff’s failure to move for a default judgment or to move for the filing of a responsive pleading (which is nonsensical
  • “The goal in awarding damages is to put the non-breaching party in the same position as if the contract would have been performed.”
  • “the parties’ actions support a reasonable inference of mutual understanding and agreement”
  • “In an action for breach of contract, a plaintiff may recover the benefit of his or her bargain as well as damages naturally and proximately caused by the breach and damages that could have been reasonably contemplated by the defendant at the time of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nannette A. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.