Guidry v. Beto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the foreign insurer “transacted business” within the meaning of CPLR 302(a)(1
• noting facts that certificate of insurance was delivered in New York and that it indicated the cargo’s destination was New York were sufficient under Section 1213
• finding jurisdiction based on § 1213 when “the certificate . . . was issued directly to a company authorized to do business in New York”
• “[N]o constitutional barriers existed to the district court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over [the foreign insurer] on these facts.”
• “Clearly, contracting to insure property located within a jurisdiction, even if the presence of that property is transitory, subjects a foreign []insurer to jurisdiction on suits over such insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).