California Court of Appeal· 12/12/1991
Guido v. Koopman
Citations
- 1 Cal. App. 4th 837
- 2 Cal. Rptr. 2d 437
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 15350
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “whether a party’s reliance was justified may be decided as a matter of law if reasonable minds can come to only one conclusion based on the facts”
- “[WJhether a party’s reliance was justified may be decided as a matter of law if reasonable minds can come to only one conclusion based on the facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-08-28· cited 407×
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-07-16· cited 144×
- In Re Joshua G.California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-10· cited 65×
- Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-19· cited 52×
- Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-03-02· cited 48×
- Eriksson v. NunninkCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-01-27· cited 40×
- Pearce v. Utah Athletic FoundationUtah Supreme Court· 2008-02-12· cited 36×
- Furla v. Jon Douglas Co.California Court of Appeal· 1998-07-29· cited 26×
- Anschutz Corp. v. MERRILL LYNCH AND CO. INC.N.D. California· 2011-03-27· cited 19×
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.D. Arizona· 2002-01-04· cited 10×
- City Solutions Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-23· cited 9×
- Levinson v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-08-26· cited 8×
- Allegis Inv. Servs., LLC v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.D. Utah· 2019-03-01· cited 8×
- Honolulu Disposal Service, Inc. v. American Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc.D. Hawaii· 2006-04-20· cited 5×
- Green Hills Software, Inc. v. Safeguard Scientifics & SPC Private Equity PartnersNinth Circuit· 2002-04-22· cited 5×
- King v. CJM Country StablesD. Hawaii· 2004-02-18· cited 2×
- Gelow v. Central Pacific Mortgage Corp.E.D. California· 2009-08-28· cited 1×
- Imperial County Department of Social Services v. Marianne G.California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-10· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2004-04-23
- Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-07-15
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-07-09· cited 391×
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-08-12· cited 216×
- Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1984-01-30· cited 176×
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-06-25· cited 90×
- Madison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-04· cited 84×
- Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1990-02-15· cited 80×
- In Re Cheryl E.California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-02· cited 73×
- Hulsey v. Elsinore Parachute CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-05-16· cited 56×
- Saenz v. Whitewater Voyages, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-12-31· cited 33×
- Kurashige v. Indian Dunes, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1988-03-23· cited 24×
- Buchan v. United States Cycling Federation, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1991-01-30· cited 22×
- Danzig v. Jack Grynberg & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-21· cited 22×
- O'Brien v. Gateway StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-05-18· cited 11×
- Dorobek v. Ride-A-While StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-05-28· cited 4×
- Griffin v. SardellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-08-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.