GUIDEONE SPECIALTY v. Congregation Bais Yisroel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a policy application form was ambiguous in part because “the question on the application regarding the insured’s ‘interest’ in the premises to be covered was overly simplistic, which made it ambiguous”
• granting the insured summary judgment on the issue of misrepresentation and finding that the insurer’s policy application question was ambiguous
• “The [common interest] doctrine dictates that the clients may not later assert the privilege against each other after their interests become adverse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).