Skip to main content

Citations

  • 24 A.D.2d 591
  • 262 N.Y.S.2d 372
  • 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not considering the effect of designation of an expert as likely to be called at trial, although the case did involve a medical examination of the opposing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.