Skip to main content
· 7/26/1876

Guffin v. Ingram

Citations

  • 8 S.C. 249
  • 1876 S.C. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when de novo review is conducted and that review is not affected by the ex parte communication, then the due-process violation is harmless
  • rejecting claim that taking of car from victim to escape and then abandoning it was not theft
  • reaching the merits of the claim without discussing procedural default
  • reaching the merits of the claim without discussing procedural default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moses, Willard, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.