Guevara v. Ferrer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lay testimony was legally sufficient to support jury’s finding that at least some of medical expenses were causally related to automobile accident that same day
• holding that “the evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding that the car accident caused all of the medical expenses awarded by the jury”
• holding that “the evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding that the car accident caused all of the medical expenses awarded by the jury”
• holding that expert testimony was required to connect auto accident to medical services incurred over the next few months, including two surgeries, numerous laboratory procedures, and treatments for respiratory failure and kidney failure
• holding that non-expert evidence of circumstances surrounding an accident was sufficient to determine that some medical expenses (being transported to an emergency room and examined in the emergency room
• holding that where there was evidence that some of the plaintiff’s medical expenses resulted from a car wreck but no evidence that all did, remand for a new trial was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).