Skip to main content
· 8/4/2000

Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.

Citations

  • 6 P.3d 250
  • 2000 Alas. LEXIS 76
  • 2000 WL 1073027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, decision whether to install highway guardrails is planning decision for which state is immune
  • explaining that in reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, we “deem[] all facts in the complaint true and provable”
  • allowing dismissal only if it was \beyond doubt\ that plaintiff could not factually support a claim for relief
  • allowing dismissal only if it was \beyond doubt\ that plaintiff could not factually support a claim for relief
  • explaining that courts reviewing a motion to dismiss under Civil Rule 12(b)(6
  • reversing finding of immunity because it was possible that the State's allegedly negligent design of housing project involved operational decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.