· 8/4/2000
Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.
Citations
- 6 P.3d 250
- 2000 Alas. LEXIS 76
- 2000 WL 1073027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, decision whether to install highway guardrails is planning decision for which state is immune
- explaining that in reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, we “deem[] all facts in the complaint true and provable”
- allowing dismissal only if it was \beyond doubt\ that plaintiff could not factually support a claim for relief
- allowing dismissal only if it was \beyond doubt\ that plaintiff could not factually support a claim for relief
- explaining that courts reviewing a motion to dismiss under Civil Rule 12(b)(6
- reversing finding of immunity because it was possible that the State's allegedly negligent design of housing project involved operational decisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.