Guerin v. Bagneries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the [GMPs] that Plaintiffs cite are generally insufficient to be the basis for an allegedly parallel state law claim”
• noting that a claim accrues and the statute of limitations begins to run when a plaintiff knows or should have known of an injury, its cause, and some evidence of wrongdoing
• violation of District of Columbia common law requiring manufacturers to warn consumers about new adverse information ‘‘is not, in fact, the functional equivalent of a manufacturer’s failure to report adverse incidents to the FDA in violation of federal law’’
• “it is by no means certain that the FDA would have directed [the manufacturer] to give consumers different or additional information about the [medical device] if the agency had been made aware of other incidents that predated [plaintiff’s] [medical] injury;”
• applying District of Columbia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).