Guenzburger v. Fernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in every case involving... [statutory] interpretation ..., analysis must begin with the language employed by Congress”
• affirming Second Circuit’s holding that transfer under section 5003 does not require a showing of a need for treatment
• characterizing the Non-Detention Act as \proscribing detention of any kind by the United States\ (emphasis in original)
• affirming Second Circuit's holding that transfer under section 5003 does not require a showing of a need for treatment
• characterizing the Non-Detention Act as “proscribing detention of any kind by the United States” (emphasis in original)
• ‘‘[Njothing in [§ 5003(a)] can be fairly read as requiring that some kind of ‘treatment’ must be furnished to every state prisoner transferred to a federal facility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).