Skip to main content
· 5/8/1987

Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.

Citations

  • 736 P.2d 763
  • 1987 Alas. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing conditions under which Alaska courts will delay or toll running of statutory limitations periods
  • noting that “we have uniformly applied a new full statutory period in equitable tolling cases,” although declining to decide “whether a plaintiff will always have the full statutory limitations period in which to file once the circumstances that justify equitable tolling abate”
  • “In order to establish a right to equitable estoppel ... [p]laintiff must also show that it resorted to legal action within a reasonable period after the circumstances ceased to justify delay.”
  • in insurance broker malpractice suit, summary judgment inappropriate where reasonable minds may disagree concerning latest reasonable date of discovery of defendant's failure to procure all-inclusive insurance coverage which defendant promised to provide
  • in insurance broker malpractice suit, summary judgment inappropriate where reasonable minds may disagree concerning latest reasonable date of discovery of defendant’s failure to procure all-inclusive insurance coverage which defendant promised to provide
  • reviewing de novo superior court’s computation of limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.