Skip to main content
· 6/28/2002

Guck v. Daniel & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 848 So. 2d 1001
  • 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 556
  • 2002 WL 1397888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding there to be a genuine issue of material fact and therefore reversing a summary judgment in favor of the employer where the record consisted of only the deposition testimony of a chiropractor and the deposition testimony of the injured employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murdock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.