Gucci America, Inc. v. Action Activewear, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court has no reason to conclude that the buyer of casual sportswear represent a particularly sophisticated group of customers.”
• “the Second Circuit has repeatedly recognized ‘that evidence that a defendant deliberately engaged in a deceptive commercial practice’ raises a presumption of consumer confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).