Skip to main content
· 9/30/1974

Guariglia v. Community National Bank & Trust Company

Citations

  • 382 F. Supp. 758
  • 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a contempt order and fine imposed in the amount of the creditor’s judgment constituted a prohibited collection action, and that labeling the order as one for contempt did not change its character as a collection tool

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.