D.C. Circuit· 2/2/2007
Guardsmark, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations
- 475 F.3d 369
- 374 U.S. App. D.C. 360
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2263
- 2007 WL 283455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that NLRB determinations are entitled to considerable deference as long as they are reasonably defensible and that the court defers to the NLRB’s interpretation of section 8(a
- maintaining overly broad no-solicitation policy was unfair labor practice even ab- sent evidence that employer applied the policy to protected concerted activity
- The “mere maintenance” of a challenged rule can violate Section 8(a)(1) “even absent evidence of enforcement[.]”
- striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
- statutory interpretation case citing Davis for the same proposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Terri Wright v. Eugene & Agnes E. Meyer FoundationD.C. Circuit· 2023-05-23· cited 84×
- Cintas Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2007-03-16· cited 18×
- Northeastern Land Services, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations BoardFirst Circuit· 2009-03-13· cited 18×
- Contemporary Cars, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSeventh Circuit· 2016-02-26· cited 14×
- Boch Imports, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardFirst Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 13×
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District of Columbia· 2012-11-27· cited 10×
- Quicken Loans, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2016-07-29· cited 9×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Northeastern Land Services, Ltd.First Circuit· 2011-06-22· cited 7×
- World Color (USA) Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2015-01-16· cited 4×
- Banner Health System v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2017-03-24· cited 4×
- Hyundai America Shipping Agency, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2015-11-06· cited 3×
- Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2009-05-04· cited 2×
- Minteq International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 1×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Illinois Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-05-01· cited 1×
- Morgan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-18
- Minteq International, Inc. v. NLRBD.C. Circuit· 2017-04-28
- Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2012-03-05
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 530×
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 439×
- Beth Israel Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 346×
- Central Hardware Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 194×
- Winthrop F. Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Limited and B. Francis SaulD.C. Circuit· 1981-10-15· cited 116×
- Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor RelationsD.C. Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 56×
- Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2001-01-26· cited 42×
- Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 1996-08-19· cited 29×
- Stanford Hospital & Clinics v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2003-04-18· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.