Guardsmark, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that NLRB determinations are entitled to considerable deference as long as they are reasonably defensible and that the court defers to the NLRB’s interpretation of section 8(a
• maintaining overly broad no-solicitation policy was unfair labor practice even ab- sent evidence that employer applied the policy to protected concerted activity
• The “mere maintenance” of a challenged rule can violate Section 8(a)(1) “even absent evidence of enforcement[.]”
• striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
• statutory interpretation case citing Davis for the same proposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).