Skip to main content
· 2/28/1995

Guardian Industries Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 317
  • 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2665
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing “antidiscrimi-nation principle” underlying the “Board’s rule”: “[G]ivingthe employees any access to a bulletin board requires the employer to accept notices relating to labor organization.” (Emphasis in original.)
  • “None of the appellate opinions singing the Board’s tune discusses Perry, and the Board itself has been conspicuously silent about that decision.”
  • “age discrimination means treating persons 40 and over differently from those who are younger”
  • “A person making a claim of discrimination must identify another case that has been treated differently and explain why that case is the same in the respects the law deems relevant or permissible as grounds of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, McDADE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.