Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is abundantly clear to the Court that Plaintiffs were not creditors ... at the time the ... contract was made nor were they the subject of [a party’s] generosity.”
• lack of contractual privity between design engineer and general contractor and subcontractor was not fatal to negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims against design engineer, notwithstanding fact that contractor and subcontractor were seeking purely economic damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).