Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Chicago Railways Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “continued employment of the employee, in and of itself, did not constitute consideration for the non-competition covenant”
• noting that “continued employment of the employee, in and of itself, did not constitute consideration for the non-competition covenant.”
• finding unenforceable a non-compete agreement executed on the first day of employment where the employee had relocated and contracted to purchase a home based on a prior oral agreement between the parties which did not contemplate the non-compete provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).