Guaranty National Insurance v. Azrock Industries Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between trigger of coverage theories for third-party personal injury claims and first-party property claims
• stating that in Unitramp, “we held that the ‘occurrence’ was not the date the tainted fuel was loaded, but the date the resulting damage become capable of being easily perceived or recognized, such as by chemical testing of the fuel.”
• distinguishing between trigger of coverage theories for third-party personal injury claims and first-party property claims
• distinguishing between trigger of coverage theories for third-party personal injury claims and first-party property claims
• applying the exposure trigger of coverage theory to a CGL policy’s liability insurance—which utilized the “occurrence” definition at issue here—but applying the manifestation trigger of coverage theory to a property damage claim under the same policy
• applying the exposure trigger of coverage theory to a CGL policy = s liability insurance C which utilized the A occurrence @ definition at issue here C but applying the manifestation trigger of coverage theory to a property damage claim under the same policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).