Guangdong Chemicals Import & Export Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for Commerce to reconsider its “departure] from its generally expressed preference for product-specific data” based on Guangdong’s submission of corroborating evidence
• identifying divergent views on a prejudice requirement from the 2nd, 5th, 9th, 11th, and D.C. Circuits
• “Commerce is given wide discretion in the selection of data sources for use in administrative review.”
• Guangdong affirmatively stated that it suffered no prejudice except that the administrative review took place
• “[s]ervice of notice provisions generally provide predictability in the administrative review process, and time for respondents to prepare a response.”
• “Even if the court were to conclude that Commerce produced substantial evidence demonstrating that azelaic and sebacic acid are priced similarly, that would not justify Commerce’s decision to abandon a more produet-specific data source.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).