Guang Run Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that implausibilities in a petitioner’s statement can contribute to an adverse credibility finding
• holding that an adverse credibility determination is sufficient to deny asylum
• stating that “our jurisprudence, except for reiteration of the repealed ‘supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence’ language, remains good law”
• noting that “cumulative effect” of minor inconsistencies supported IJ’s other grounds for denial of asylum
• opining that “cumulative effect” of three major and a few minor inconsistencies constituted substantial evidence to affirm adverse credibility determination
• explaining that “we . . . review[] the IJ’s adverse credibility determination for ‘substantial evidence,’ reversing only if ‘any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).