Guaman v. New York City Hous. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Alford plea valid without defendant’s admission of intent because defendant believed state’s evidence was sufficient to convict
• stating that Fleck construed language that was “substantively identical” to language of domestic-assault statute
• stating that “[d]omestic assault is a general-intent crime, requiring only evidence that a defendant ‘intended to do the physical act, [not] that the defendant meant to violate the law 3 or cause a particular result’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).