Skip to main content
· 12/28/1973

Guadamuz v. Ash

Citations

  • 368 F. Supp. 1233
  • 6 ERC 1213
  • 6 ERC (BNA) 1213
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when funds have been appropriated for a purpose, “the Executive has no residual constitutional power to refuse to spend these appropriations”
  • granting declaratory judgment that impoundment of certain funds was unauthorized by law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flannery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.