· 12/28/1973
Guadamuz v. Ash
Citations
- 368 F. Supp. 1233
- 6 ERC 1213
- 6 ERC (BNA) 1213
- 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, when funds have been appropriated for a purpose, “the Executive has no residual constitutional power to refuse to spend these appropriations”
- granting declaratory judgment that impoundment of certain funds was unauthorized by law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flannery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.