Guadalupe Caldera v. Ins Co. of the State of PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff’s claim was brought under the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute
• “[A]n exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional in nature only if Congress statutorily mandates that a claimant exhaust administrative remedies.”
• “[A]n MSP claimant may not recover amounts from a purported ‘primary plan’ in excess of a carrier’s responsibility un- der state law or the relevant contract.”
• “[A]n MSP claimant may not recover amounts from a purported ‘primary plan’ in excess of a carrier’s responsibility un- der state law or the relevant contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).