Skip to main content
· 7/16/1996

Guadagno v. Wallack Ader Levithan Assoc.

Citations

  • 932 F. Supp. 94
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10129
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,381
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 811
  • 1996 WL 405808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘argumentative inferences favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction should not be drawn’ ”
  • “ ‘argumentative inferences favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction should not be drawn’ ”
  • “Argumentative inferences favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction should not be drawn.”
  • “[W]hile the Court may resolve a factual dispute over jurisdiction at the time the motion is filed, it also has discretion to defer final determination of the dispute until the time of trial, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.