Skip to main content
· 12/2/2002

Gu v. Boston Police Department

Citations

  • 312 F.3d 6
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24316
  • 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,319
  • 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1687
  • 2002 WL 31681945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the loss of some supervisory authority as a result of a restructuring is insufficient for an adverse employment action
  • noting that only a dramatic decrease in supervisory authority may constitute an adverse employment action
  • finding a company’s most senior employees’ loss of supervisory authority, exclusion from office meetings, and diminished communications regarding office matters to be adverse employment actions
  • “Material changes include demotions, disadvantageous transfers or assignments, refusals to promote, unwarranted negative job evaluations, and toleration of harassment by other employees.”
  • “Certainly, if an employee suddenly finds herself with dramatically decreased supervisory authority and without a voice in major decisions, this could constitute an adverse employment action.”
  • “Certainly, if an employee suddenly finds herself with dramatically decreased supervisory authority and without a voice in major decisions, this could constitute an adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Greenberg, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.