· 12/2/2002
Gu v. Boston Police Department
Citations
- 312 F.3d 6
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24316
- 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,319
- 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1687
- 2002 WL 31681945
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the loss of some supervisory authority as a result of a restructuring is insufficient for an adverse employment action
- noting that only a dramatic decrease in supervisory authority may constitute an adverse employment action
- finding a company’s most senior employees’ loss of supervisory authority, exclusion from office meetings, and diminished communications regarding office matters to be adverse employment actions
- “Material changes include demotions, disadvantageous transfers or assignments, refusals to promote, unwarranted negative job evaluations, and toleration of harassment by other employees.”
- “Certainly, if an employee suddenly finds herself with dramatically decreased supervisory authority and without a voice in major decisions, this could constitute an adverse employment action.”
- “Certainly, if an employee suddenly finds herself with dramatically decreased supervisory authority and without a voice in major decisions, this could constitute an adverse employment action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Greenberg, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.