Gtnx, Inc. v. Inttra, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the APA “is not a jurisdiction-conferring statute” (internal quotation omitted)
• cit- ing Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, 529 F.3d 1352, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
• cit- ing Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, 529 F.3d 1352, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
• “[A]dministrative agencies possess inherent authority to reconsider their decisions, subject to certain limitations, regardless of whether they possess explicit statutory authority to do so.”
• same analysis as applied to \covered business method\ review proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).