· 12/12/1991
GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
Citations
- 1 Cal. App. 4th 827
- 2 Cal. Rptr. 2d 441
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 15305
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where a statute or amendment clarifies existing law, such action is not considered a change because it merely restates the law as it was at the time, and retroactivity is not involved.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.