Gte Service Corporation,petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, North Point Communications, Inc., Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “disputed terms at issue—‘necessary,’ ‘physical collocation,’ and ‘premises’ ... are ambiguous in their meanings”
• interpreting \necessary\ in s 251(c)(6) -- \collocation of equipment necessary for interconnection\ -- to mean \indispensable\
• FCC regulations permitting collocation of remote switching modules exceeds the reach of S 251(c)(6) by interpreting \necessary\ to mean efficient or useful
• FCC regulations permitting collocation of remote switching modules exceeds the reach of S 251(c)(6) by interpreting \necessary\ to mean efficient or useful
• dealing with 47 U.S.C. § 251

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).