Skip to main content
· 4/20/2000

Gte North, Inc. v. John G. Strand

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 909
  • 31 Communications Reg. (P&F) 367
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7024
  • 2000 WL 424028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding § 1331 jurisdiction where § 252(e)(6) jurisdiction was lacking for cases that are \the product . . . of an independent state law proceeding\
  • because this case does not concern a disputed issue of state law. . . Burford abstention is inappropriate.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Norris, Feikens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.