Gsell v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Oregon law and stating that an opinion statement only constitutes fraud if it is a “reckless statement of an opinion by one with special knowledge”
• applying Oregon law and stating, “[t]he statement of an opinion not actually held, or the reckless statement of an opinion by one with special knowledge, constitutes fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-24· cited 25×
• Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-24· cited 16×
• Bernstein v. Brenner
  D.C. Circuit· 1970-12-14· cited 12×
• William Earl Gsell, and v. C. A. Dumbeck, and John N. Adams, III and Donald A. Rowberry, And
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-09-30· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-10-21· cited 42×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 1967-01-16· cited 38×
• Southern Pac. Co. v. Libbey
  Ninth Circuit· 1952-10-01· cited 16×
• Hester v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
  D. South Carolina· 1968-06-19· cited 10×
• Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Virgil N. Lee, Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Margaret L. Pagett
  Ninth Circuit· 1962-11-14· cited 8×
• Lackey v. Ellingsen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-10-04· cited 8×
• Carl M. Taute, Dba Econo-Car of Billings v. Econo-Car International, Inc., Econo-Car International, Inc. v. Carl M. Taute, Dba Econo-Car of Billings
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-07-07· cited 3×