Skip to main content
· 5/17/2004

GSC Partners CDO Fund v. Washington

Citations

  • 368 F.3d 228
  • 2004 WL 1087376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that scienter can be established “by alleging facts that constitute strong circumstantial evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness.”
  • defining recklessness in this context as “[e]xtreme departure from the standards of ordinary care” that “presents a danger of misleading buyers or sellers that is either known to the defendant or is so obvious that the actor must have been aware of it.”
  • “In every corporate transaction, the corporation and its officers have a desire to complete the transaction, and officers will usually reap financial benefits from a successful transaction.”
  • “[A]n underwriter’s alleged motive to earn its underwriting fees is not alone sufficient to sustain a strong inference of fraudulent intent.”
  • “Of course, it is not enough for plaintiffs to merely allege that defendants ‘knew’ their statements were fraudulent or that defendants ‘must have known’ their statements were false.”
  • scienter, as required under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, can be established by “alleging facts that constitute strong circumstantial evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth, McKee, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.