Gryce v. Lavine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that court must inquire whether both parties’ interpretations of the contract are reasonable
• a contract is ambiguous if a reasonable person could ascribe to it more than one interpretation
• “The choice among reasonable interpretations of an ambiguous contract is for the factfinder to make, based on the evidence presented by the parties to support their respective interpretations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).