Skip to main content
· 6/5/2017

Grussing v. State

Citations

  • 164 A.3d 919
  • 2017 WL 2439076
  • 2017 Del. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding from an independent review of the record on appeal that the defendant’s suppressed statement did not form a “substantial part of the proof” against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.