Gruss v. Cummins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “parol evidence is not admissible to show that even signed writings relate to the same transaction”
• stating that “parol evidence is not admissible to show that even signed writings relate to the same transaction”
• stating that ORRI “is an interest in land”
• stating that ORRI “is an interest in land”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).