Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it was relator's illegal act resulting in arrest and incarceration that was the cause of his failure to accept suitable work when it was offered to him
• holding relator who failed to show up at work because he was arrested and incarcerated for an offense to which he entered a guilty plea had committed employee misconduct
• noting that it was relator’s illegal act resulting in arrest and incarceration that was the cause of his failure to accept suitable work when it was offered to him
• providing for applicant’s disqualification for benefits “[i]f the commissioner finds that he has failed, without good cause to accept suitable work when offered to him”
• failing to respond to a recall notice because he was in jail
• failing to respond to a recall notice because he was in jail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).