Grupo Televisa, S.A. v. Telemundo Communications Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jurisdiction’s allowance of punitive damages regulated conduct “on some level” by punishing wrongdoers
• explaining that the location of a defendant’s conduct is the “single most important contact” pursuant to Section 145 of the Restatement on Conflicts of Law
• providing that federal courts considering state-law claims should apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state
• discussing the importance of the Restatement’s commentary and of the place where the conduct occurred in certain cases
• discussing the importance of the place where the conduct causing injury occurred
• “A federal court sitting in diversity will apply the conflict-of-laws rules of the forum state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).