Gruning v. DiPaolo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Ruiz held that the government is not constitutionally required to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering into a plea bargain
• recognizing that Ruiz held that the government is not constitutionally required to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering into a plea bargain
• recognizing that Ruiz held that the government is not constitutionally required to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering into a plea bargain
• holding that the deferential standard of review prescribed by section 2254(d) does not apply to a state inmate's habeas petition when the state appellate court failed to address the petitioner's constitutional claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).