Grund v. Donegan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “wholly fail[ed] to state a cause of action for tortious interference with contract” where no breach of contract was alleged
• stating that a plaintiff may rely on any allegations of fact made in the complaint
• affirming dismissal of claim where defendant was not alleged to have directed communications directly or indirectly toward the third party
• to avoid dismissal plaintiff must allege sufficient facts in support of each element of a cause of action
• to avoid dismissal plaintiff must allege sufficient facts in support of each element of a cause of action
• plaintiff’s complaint “wholly fail[ed] to state a cause of action for tortious interference with contract” where it “nowhere allege[d] any breach of contract” by the third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).