Gruidl v. Schell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f there is any evi- dence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, a question of fact is presented that must be left to the jury for determination.”
• “The 12 No. 20-2059 question of contributory negligence is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury. If there is any evidence of contributory neg- ligence on the part of the plaintiff, a question of fact is pre- sented that must be left to the jury for determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).