Skip to main content
· 1/2/1962

Gruida v. Giller

Citations

  • 406 Pa. 111
  • 176 A.2d 903
  • 1962 Pa. LEXIS 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming new trial order where exclusion of attending physician’s testimony relating to the cause of the plaintiffs injuries was prejudicial to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, Alpekn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.