Skip to main content
· 8/28/1992

Gruhin v. City of Overland Park

Citations

  • 836 P.2d 1222
  • 17 Kan. App. 2d 388
  • 1992 Kan. App. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary judgment was inappropriate where employees of a golf club had knowledge of a prior accident occurring at the same location
  • finding that summary judgment was not proper because city knew of prior injury, so city had actual knowledge of the danger
  • evaluating the appropriateness of summary judgment on a gross and wanton negligence issue
  • restrictions such as a user s fee do not prevent a governmental entity from asserting immunity pursuant to K.S.A. 75-6104[o]
  • restrictions such as a user's fee do not prevent a governmental entity from asserting immunity pursuant to K.S.A. 75-6104[o]
  • it is presumed that a statute subject to interpretation was intended to have the most reasonable operation that its language permits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, P.J., Gernon, J., and E. Newton Vickers, District Judge Retired, Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.