Skip to main content
· 5/30/1924

Grubbs v. Young

Citations

  • 203 Ky. 454
  • 262 S.W. 612
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, [the expert’s] methodologies are not clearly unsound or unreasonable, this Court declines to exclude his testimony on a Daubert motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.