Grubbs v. Prince George's County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “we have regarded it [the predecessor statute to the LGTCA, Md.Code (1957, 1972 Repl.Vol.), Art. 57, § 18] as a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action for damages”
• interpreting the notice provision of the LGTCA predecessor statute, Md.Code (1957, 1972 Repl.Vol.) Art. 57, § 18, 8 “as a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action for damages”
• interpreting the notice provision of the LGTCA predecessor statute, Md.Code (1957, 1972 Repl.Vol.) Art. 57, § 18, [8] \as a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action for damages\
• stating “we have regarded it [the predecessor statute to the LGTCA, Maryland Code (1957, 1972 Repl.Vol.) Art. 57, § 18] as a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action for damages”
• stating “we have regarded it [the predecessor statute to the LGTCA, Md.Code (1957, 1972 RepLVoL), Art. 57, § 18] as a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action for damages”
• adopting the same reasoning for a similarly worded statute in a personal injury context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).