Grubb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding \Grubb's procedural due process rights were adequately protected when she raised her concerns in her timely 3.800(b) motion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Durant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-09· cited 9×
• Ladson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-20· cited 8×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 4×
• Lavender v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-04· cited 2×
• Velez-Pizzini v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28· cited 2×
• West v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-15· cited 1×
• RONALD L. THOMPSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-16· cited 1×
• Osterhoudt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-16· cited 1×
• Spitalieri v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maddox v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-11· cited 262×
• State v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-02-22· cited 141×
• Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-12· cited 84×
• Brock v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 17×
• State v. Joly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-01· cited 3×
• Russman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 2×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-01· cited 2×