Grubb & Ellis Co. v. First Texas Savings Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Proof of intent to confuse or deceive consumers is not necessary to establish trademark infringement, and lack of such intent adds nothing to the likelihood of confusions analysis.”
• survey evidence may not be necessary to show likelihood of 18 19 confusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).