Groves v. Ring Screw Works, Ferndale Fastener Div.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the strong federal policy favoring judicial enforcement of collective-bargaining agreements”
• given intercircuit conflict and panel's doubt about correctness of circuit precedent, \it might have been appropriate for the panel to request a rehearing en banc \
• given intercircuit conflict and panel’s doubt about correctness of circuit precedent, “it might have been appropriate for the panel to request a rehearing en banc ”
• absent wholesale irrationality, to violate the duty of fair representation, it is necessary that the union act with bad faith motivation
• “Section 301 contemplates which [the supplier] did not have a direct contractual suits by and against individual employees as well as between relationship.”
• “We have squarely held that § 301 authorizes suits by and against individual employees as well as between unions and employers[.]” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).